Saturday, May 18, 2019
Philips vs Matsushita
Philips vs Matsushita A New Century, A New Round HBS 9-302-049 Discussion Questions 1. How did Philips become the spark advance consumer electronics company after the Second World War and what were its key capabilities? (NOs-organizational development) Post-war situation * (At the very beginning, Philips made scarcely light-bulbs, this one-product focus and Gerards technological prowess enabled the company to create significant innovations. * The labs developed a repayable west metal filament bulb that was a great commercial success and gave Philips the financial strength to get by a crystallizest its giant rivals. Philips started to export in 1899. * In 1912, Philips started building sales organizations in the US, Canada, and France. In many abroad countries Philips created local joint venture to gain food commercialize acceptance. * In 1919, Philips entered into the Principal Agreement with General Electric, giving each company the use of the others patents. Philips conduc ted a decentralized sales organization with autofocus marketing companies in 14 European countries, China, Brazil, and Australia. * During the period, Philips broadened its product line significantly. During the late 1930s, it transferred its overseas assets to two trusts, moved more or less of its vital research laboratories and top management. Therefore, individual country organizations became more independent during the war. * Built post-war organization on the strengths of the national organizations. (NOs) * Their greatly increased self-sufficiency during the war had allowed most to become adept at responding to country-specific market conditions-a capacity that became a valuable asset in the post-war era. After War * Cross-functional coordination capability. Foreign trading operations. * Decrease the descend of products marketed, build scale by concentrating employment, and increase products flows across NOs. * Close the least efficient local plants and transfer the best into International Production Centres, each supplying many NOs. * Close inefficient operations and focussed on core operations. * Designed various businesses as core and non-core. * * In 1912, as the electric lamp manufacturing began to show signs of overcapacity, Philips started building sales organizations in the US, Canada, and France.In many foreign countries Philips created local joint ventures to gain market acceptance. * Built post-war organization on the strengths of the national organizations. (NOs) Their greatly increased self-sufficiency during the war had allowed most to become adept at responding to country-specific market conditions-a capacity that became a valuable asset in the post-war era. * In the environment where consumer preferences and economic conditions varied, the independent NOs had a great advantage in being able to signified and respond to the differences.Eventually, responsiveness extended beyond adaptive marketing. * NOs had the real power, they repo rted directly to the management senesce to ensure that top management remained in contact with the highly autonomous NOs. Each NO to a fault regularly sent envoys to Eindhoven to represent its interests. * International Concern Council to formalize-regular meetings with the heads of all major NOs. * Cross-functional coordination capability * Foreign operations Problems In the late 1960s, the creation of the European Common Market eroded trade barriers and diluted the precept for independent country subsidiaries. New transistor-based technologies demanded larger production runs than most national plants could justify, and many of Philips competitors were moving production of electronics to new facilities in low-wage areas in Asia and South America. * Simultaneously, Philips ability to bring its innovative products to market began to falter.Too decentralized, muted responding to global market because of cooperation complexity between NOs and PDs (CEO words) * The European market te nded to become more centralized due to the disappearance of trade barriers in late 1960s. Philipss formal globalized organization (strategy) shows its weakness and prevents Philips from further development. * IPC to restrict NOstilting matrix to PD, more centralized * Lack of global cooperation, like more manufacturing in developing countries * No strategylife styledownsize unrelated products Marketing problem 2. How was Matsushita able to overtake Philips? What were its strategic competences and how were these insert in its organisation structure? * How Matsushita recognized the potential mass-market of VCR and considerably expanded through change magnitude VCR sales and licencing the VHS format to other manufacture. However, at that time Philips ability to bring its innovative products to market began to falter.Even if it invented the most superior format V2000 videocassette, it failed to commercialized it and had to outsource a VHS product which it manufactured nether license from Matsushita * Strategic competences of Matsushita internal competition among small business spurs growth by leveraging technology to develop new products, strong incorporate as well as support from Japan promoted original efficiency * Organisation structure Matsushita used the divisional structure(small businesses, corporate funds, CRL & product development) and maintained strong control over their operations through two ways of reporting, directly to appropriate product division or to METC 3. How did Matsushitas capabilities and structure later lead to disadvantages? * As Matsushita grows bigger and bigger, more materials purchasing from the local and overseas countries claims more localization, communication between subsidiaries and Japan became difficult and control from Japan deteriorates * Expansion faced chokepoint and Matsushita needed more creativity to promote growth, but the operation localizations lack of innovative capability as they act primarily as the implemen tation arms of Japanese-based product divisions 4. Why do both firms make up ones mind it difficult to build new capabilities and what advice would you offer them?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.